Gun Laws Should Not Be Stricter Gun Control - 858 Words

Many tragedies have occurred recently that have spurred the debate on whether or not we need tighter gun controls. On one side of the debate are the gun control supporters, who claim that the easy access to guns is the primary cause for high rates of crime plaguing the United States. On the other side are people who argue that gun laws will not prevent criminals from obtaining guns, since they will continue to get them illegally. Guns are used for protection when in the hands of people who obey the law. It is crucial to not hinder law-abiding citizen’s ability to possess firearms with stricter gun laws, since gun laws do not lower crime, and guns can keep people safe. One of the biggest arguments against gun control is that it does not prevent criminals from committing violent crimes, such as murder. Based on information gathered by Argesti and Smith, this A Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) study showed that when a handgun ban was put in effect in Washington D.C. â€Å"t he murder rate averaged 73% higher than it was at the outset of the law† (Argesti and Smith). Another report from the FBI showed that when Florida and Texas implemented a right-to-carry law, their murder rates dropped by 30 and 36 percent (qtd. in Argesti and Smith). It is blatantly obvious that areas with high crime will continue to have the same level of crime, even after the implementation of stricter gun control laws. In areas where crime is high, guns can keep law-abiding citizens safe. As stated byShow MoreRelatedShould Gun Control Be Stricter Gun Laws? Essay1467 Words   |  6 PagesAmericans were killed by guns, excluding suicides. How many of those deaths would have been prevented if there were stricter gun laws? How many parents would have lived to see their babies grow up? How many children would have lived to graduate, or get married? Although many Americans believe that gun control takes away their second amendment right it actually increases every citizen†™s safety by the use of extensive background checking, checking medical records, and restricting gun distributors. On aRead MoreShould Gun Laws Be Stricter Gun Control?1354 Words   |  6 PagesRights for Guns We have all been through that pain of losing a love one either it was to an incurable disease, old age, and car accident or during time of war. Nevertheless, we have lost more love ones through gun violence. People have own guns since the time guns were invented, but â€Å"Are guns for everyone?† We have heard of gun laws throughout the whole United States of America some enforce those laws and other do not. The government enforce stricter gun control laws so the public can be safe, toRead MoreShould Gun Control Laws be Stricter?1336 Words   |  6 PagesShould gun control laws be stricter? Every day some news related to gun violence are being heard all over the world. Shooting in driveway, public places, schools, homicide and suicide are some of different types of gun violence. Shooting on people and killing them is a big issue in the world and different comments are provided about that. One of the most important of them is about gun control laws. Stingl (2013) says â€Å"The term gun control as it is used in the United States refers to any action takenRead MoreGun Control Laws Should Be Stricter Laws931 Words   |  4 Pagesthere should be stricter gun control laws. By this they mean, regulate the sale, manufacture, possession, transfer, and use of firearms. They believe if the government does not make stricter gun control laws, then gun violence and deaths due to guns will only continue to increase over the years. Although there are many people for gun control laws, there are many people who are also against it. Some of the people who are against gun control laws p robably will not understand why there should be stricterRead MoreGun Laws Should Be Stricter Gun Control1227 Words   |  5 PagesUnited States are the most top armed nations around the world, and there are 270 million guns which are held by US civilians (Brussel). With the large number of guns, it could become unpredictable without proper gun control. As an example, the tragedy was brought upon the nation on December 14 2012, twenty children and six staff members was killed by a single man at Sandy Hook Elementary school. New York passed the Ammunition and Firearms enforcement act of 2013 becoming the first state to respondRead MoreThe Debate Over Stricter Gun Control Laws924 Words   |  4 PagesThe debate over stricter gun laws has been ongoing in the United States for quite some time now. Individuals who oppose stricter gun control laws argue that the second amendment to the constitution of the United States constitute part of the bill of rights that protect the right of Amer ican citizens to bear arms, and any attempt to set up laws for gun control will be a direct violation of this (Hofstadter 10). They argue that the primary purpose of the amendment was to ensure that American CitizensRead MoreBennett Dorton. English 11. 1-26-17.Gun Control In America.1270 Words   |  6 PagesBennett Dorton English 11 1-26-17 Gun Control In America Every time a gun injures or kills in self defense it is used seven times in a criminal assault or homicide; furthermore the main argument against stricter gun laws is the fact that they are needed for self defense. Gun control is a very controversial and debatable topic, and many people have different opinions. In the Constitution, The Second Amendment gives the right to bear arms, but there have been restrictionsRead MoreThe Debate Over Stricter Gun Control929 Words   |  4 Pages Gun Control in the United States The debate over stricter gun laws has been ongoing in the United States for quite some time now. Individuals who oppose stricter gun control laws argue that the second amendment to the constitution of the United States constitute part of the bill of rights that protect the right for American citizens to bear arms, and any attempt to set up laws for gun control will be a direct violation on this (Hofstadter 10). They argueRead MoreStricter Gun Control Essay1044 Words   |  5 PagesThe Need for Stricter Gun Control In the world we are living in today guns are a major issue for the general safety of people. No one should be nervous to go to large functions such as a concert or sports event but in the U.S. it seems like doing things like that are getting scarier and scarier each day. How much longer until people are scared to do everyday activities? At the rate things are going it seems like it might not be long. Stricter gun control is desperately needed due to the high amountRead MorePersuasive Essay On Gun Control739 Words   |  3 Pagesconsider that guns are a tool when in clear fact they are not, they are very dangerous weapons. Even though some may say that they only use firearms primarily for hunting, majority of guns in the world are used for one thing killing. By standing beside gun control it’s the safest route to follow because it can lower the rates of the amount of gun related crimes such as murder, and robbery being committed. But the most important thing is that it can provide is safety, putting more stricter laws on owning

Mental health Court Liaison Services

Question: Discuss about the Mental health Court Liaison Services. Answer: Introduction: The aim of the discussion is to evaluate how the Mental Health Court of Australia has been used. Greater focus will be made on the use of these institutions in Queensland. Mental Health Court in Queensland is unique; it has its flaws in terms of the constraint resources and it is the best system for those who have been charged with offences and also suffers through mental illness and disability. The Mental Health Court in Australia replaced the Mental Health Tribunal that used to serve the similar function and existed since 1980s. It was in February 2002, that this court started to function under the Mental Health Act 2000 (Mhrt.qld.gov.au 2016). The Court has two Supreme Court Judges, and they are assisted by two well experienced forensic psychiatrists. The major function of the Court is to determine the exact area where there remains the possibility of insanity or unfitness for trial. Liaison service of the Mental Health Court in Australia: All the Australian states and the territories have liaison with the Mental Health Courts except the Northern Territory (Davidson et al. 2016). The primary aim is to identify the health condition of the person who has been charged. The court liaison service is to identify the mental state by various stages of trail. The aim is to give justice to the sufferers rather than putting the person on remand for the crime that might have been conducted under unconsciousness (Scott et al. 2013). In the South East Queensland, the Metro North Mental Health Service Court Liaison Service provides service to the court. The primary purpose of this liaison is to take immediate response towards assessment, liaison, referral and even the diversion of the mentally ill individuals in the custody (Heslin et al. 2016). By the means of short term interventions, the prospected guilty are given assistance and support. This automatically facilitates a care for the people and correctional facilities to the community based services. Who can be charged in a Mental Health Court? The court is responsible for charging a person with any indictable offence. A person charge with claims like personal violence, assault to murder, and any psychotic assaults are charged in Mental Health Courts (Leese 2016). Other offences include sex or property related offences. However, sometime fraud committed by bipolar sufferers in a maniac phase or a person suffering from dementia, usually involve questions of unfitness. The Director of Mental Health, where a person with mental health issue is already present; the director of Public Prosecutions from the Supreme court or even a District court can refer a person to the Mental Health Court if found guilty (Heslin et al. 2016). However, these cases are not very common and those who are already in mental state are more likely to be referred here. It is only when the questions of unsoundness and unfitness are resolved by thorough checks and identifications the ill person is sent on the remand. How the Mental Health Court works? The reference of the person is accompanied with expert reports. Each party is supposed to present the reports to the court irrespective of the detrimental situation of the one found guilty. The court examines the report by the court-appointed experts (Scott et al. 2013). The assisted psychiatrists review the references and other accompanied information to determine the current state of the accused. In this respect, it has to be mentioned that due to constrained budgetary resources, the court at times often delay the procedure. It has been found that majority of the cases that are directed by the lawyers to the court. Many cases are dismissed at the court because it is observed that the guilty has committed the crime because the person is unsound or has been suffering from mental health issues (Morrison 2013). People accused of murder cases were also not found guilty due to their health state. The main courts have been relying on the service of these Mental Health Courts for proper justice to the accused. Conclusion: An analysis on the working of the Mental Health Court of Australia has been made. The Court is responsible to charge a person with unsound mental condition or other intellectual disability. A person who is not fit for trial in a Supreme or the District court is brought here. The judgement of the court is accompanied by the decision of forensic experts. References: Davidson, F., Heffernan, E., Greenberg, D., Butler, T. and Burgess, P., 2016. A critical review of mental health court liaison services in Australia: a first national survey.Psychiatry, Psychology and Law,23(6), pp.908-921. Heslin, M., Callaghan, L., Barrett, B., Lea, S., Eick, S., Morgan, J., Bolt, M., Thornicroft, G., Rose, D., Healey, A. and Patel, A., 2016. Costs of the police service and mental healthcare pathways experienced by individuals with enduring mental health needs.The British Journal of Psychiatry, pp.bjp-bp. Leese, M., 2016. Mental Health Policing: A perspective from the front-lineof police custody. Mhrt.qld.gov.au 2016 Mental Health Review Tribunal Available at: https://www.mhrt.qld.gov.au/?page_id=30 [Accessed on: 25-3-2017] Morrison, A., 2013 Mental Health Court dismissed more than half of cases Available at: https://www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/news/mental-health-court-dismissed-more-half-cases-repo/1844170/ [Accessed on: 25-3-2017] Scott, D.A., McGilloway, S., Dempster, M., Browne, F. and Donnelly, M., 2013. Effectiveness of criminal justice liaison and diversion services for offenders with mental disorders: a review.Psychiatric Services,64(9), pp.843-849.